Today I want to talk about the battle PUBLIC vs PRIVATE. I will start by asking you something: Would you agree with a monopoly annexation of your tap water? Debra Anderson said NO! Debra Anderson, officially works in a real estate agency in her hometown of McCloud, California. In reality, Debra lets her husband take care of business, and devoted her time and energy to fight against the Nestlé group.
![]() |
| (Hall , Lobina and de la Motte, 2007) |
According to the graph
below, it seems that private-sector is widely facing strong public opposition.
Privatisation
is extensively unpopular mainly because of the feeling that it is profoundly
unfair, both in conception and execution. (Birdsall and Nellis, 2002).
One
day in 2003, "Nestle had obtained the right to manage water in the city
with unlimited freedom. No impact study was made, Nestle get an exclusive
hundred years contract, and the right to pump - including the right to raze the old wood factory in the city ” (Debra
Anderson). In exchange, Nestlé assured to create 240 jobs, and pay various
taxes and fees. In fact, the region is considered as a deprived area (us.gov, 2014).
With some friends and colleagues, she created an association,
the McCloud Watershed Council. The Watershed Council brings together citizens,
who, in normal times, are completely opposed- including Conservative
Republicans, liberal Democrats and environmentalists.
Activists
argued thats water is not a commodity, it is an essential element for
life, which must remain in the public domain. This is in contradiction to what
Nestle’s CEO publicly claimed “water should be privatized, and it is not a human right”.

No comments:
Post a Comment